From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j33KLjO27950 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:21:45 -0400 Received: from pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j33KLeVr013839 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:21:40 -0400 Received: from pd3mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.180]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEE008YV0K3TF20@l-daemon> for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:21:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80]) by pd3mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEE00C7U0K3CH80@pd3mr4so.prod.shaw.ca> for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:21:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.124] (S01060050ba84447c.vc.shawcable.net [24.86.200.241]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IEE00F020K3BQ@l-daemon> for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:21:39 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:21:47 -0800 From: Terry Rigby Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM Error In-reply-to: <200504031318.55164.t-rigby@shaw.ca> Message-id: <200504031321.47440.t-rigby@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200504031040.05910.t-rigby@shaw.ca> <200504031313.39260.t-rigby@shaw.ca> <200504031318.55164.t-rigby@shaw.ca> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com nevermind, I am an idiot. those are just dead symlinks. On April 3, 2005 01:18 pm, Terry Rigby wrote: > one more thing I just noticed... > > fileserver:~# vgscan -vv > Setting global/locking_type to 1 > Setting global/locking_dir to /var/lock/lvm > File-based locking enabled. > Wiping cache of LVM-capable devices > /dev/4474.old/storage: stat failed: No such file or directory > /dev/cdrom: stat failed: No such file or directory > Wiping internal cache > Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... > Finding all volume groups > /dev/hda: No label detected > /dev/hdc: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdc1: No label detected > /dev/hda2: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hda5: No label detected > /dev/hda6: No label detected > /dev/hda7: No label detected > /dev/hdb: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdd: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdb1: No label detected > Locking /var/lock/lvm/V_4474 RB > Finding volume group "4474" > /dev/hda2: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdc: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdb: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdd: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hda2: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdc: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdb: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdd: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hda2: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdc: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdb: lvm2 label detected > /dev/hdd: lvm2 label detected > Found volume group "4474" using metadata type lvm2 > Unlocking /var/lock/lvm/V_4474 > > the two lines " /dev/4474.old/storage: stat failed: No such file or > directory" and " /dev/cdrom: stat failed: No such file or directory" > I find curious. This could be nothing but then again, maybe it is. I am > really too new to LVM to know. > > Terry Rigby > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/