From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j34M61O03604 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:06:01 -0400 Received: from percy.comedia.it (percy.comedia.it [212.97.59.71]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j34M5stL017907 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:05:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:05:51 +0200 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: putting lvm autodetect into the kernel ala md Message-ID: <20050404220550.GA23505@percy.comedia.it> References: <424CA0D1.5060905@nospam.com> <424DA811.4040508@nospam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <424DA811.4040508@nospam.com> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:59:13AM +0800, Andy Sy wrote: > >Dispensing with the need for an initrd is but a secondary concern, >and fact is, I would also say that it brings a lot of flexiblity to >the table. So no, having lvm autodetect in the kernel is not >what I'm looking for. What we're looking for is good lvm support >in LILO. Christophe patches to lilo help a bit, but there still are limitations. http://www.saout.de/misc/ -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \