All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Jian <lark@linux.net.cn>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:35:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405133336.0247.LARK@linux.net.cn> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 390 bytes --]

Hi,

This is a simple patch against net/sched/cls_fw.c. The idea of this
patch is discussed in this thread

https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-March/018762.html

I chose 509 for FW_FILTER_HSIZE. If you feel it is waste of memory, then
251 is good too.

BTW: I don't know much about hash performance and hash distribution of
jhash. This is a quick fix.



-- 
  lark

[-- Attachment #2: hash-cls_fw.diff --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1029 bytes --]

Index: cls_fw.c
===================================================================
--- cls_fw.c	(revision 1)
+++ cls_fw.c	(working copy)
@@ -45,10 +45,13 @@
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/act_api.h>
 #include <net/pkt_cls.h>
+#include <linux/jhash.h>
 
+#define FW_FILTER_HSIZE		509
+
 struct fw_head
 {
-	struct fw_filter *ht[256];
+	struct fw_filter *ht[FW_FILTER_HSIZE];
 };
 
 struct fw_filter
@@ -69,7 +72,7 @@
 
 static __inline__ int fw_hash(u32 handle)
 {
-	return handle&0xFF;
+	return (jhash_1word(handle, 0xF30A7129) % FW_FILTER_HSIZE);
 }
 
 static int fw_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_proto *tp,
@@ -152,7 +155,7 @@
 	if (head == NULL)
 		return;
 
-	for (h=0; h<256; h++) {
+	for (h=0; h<FW_FILTER_HSIZE; h++) {
 		while ((f=head->ht[h]) != NULL) {
 			head->ht[h] = f->next;
 			fw_delete_filter(tp, f);
@@ -291,7 +294,7 @@
 	if (arg->stop)
 		return;
 
-	for (h = 0; h < 256; h++) {
+	for (h = 0; h < FW_FILTER_HSIZE; h++) {
 		struct fw_filter *f;
 
 		for (f = head->ht[h]; f; f = f->next) {

             reply	other threads:[~2005-04-05  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05  5:35 Wang Jian [this message]
2005-04-05  5:37 ` [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function David S. Miller
2005-04-05  6:05   ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 10:25     ` jamal
2005-04-05 10:38     ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-05 11:25       ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 12:16         ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-05 12:39           ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 12:52             ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-05 13:29               ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 12:54             ` jamal
2005-04-05 14:18               ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 16:11                 ` jamal
2005-04-06  6:45                   ` Wang Jian
2005-04-06 12:16                     ` jamal
2005-04-06 12:30                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-06 13:01                       ` Wang Jian
2005-04-06 13:34                       ` jamal
2005-04-06 13:45                         ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-06 14:10                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-06 18:15                             ` David S. Miller
2005-04-06 18:31                               ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-07  0:55                                 ` [RFC] dynamic hash table size & xor hash function for cls_fw Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 10:38                                   ` jamal
2005-04-07 10:47                                     ` Wang Jian
2005-04-07 10:51                                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 11:07                                       ` jamal
2005-04-07 13:09                                         ` [PATCH] [PKT_SCHED]: improve hashing performance of cls_fw Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 13:31                                           ` Wang Jian
2005-04-07 13:52                                             ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 14:03                                               ` Wang Jian
2005-04-06 13:36                       ` [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function Eran Mann
2005-04-06 13:53                         ` Wang Jian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050405133336.0247.LARK@linux.net.cn \
    --to=lark@linux.net.cn \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.