From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DJ4YH-0003mf-N2 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:02:13 -0700 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1DJ4YH-0004XA-4M for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:02:13 -0700 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.9-bs7 panic on check_sysemu References: <4250729B.7040407@rimuhosting.com> <200504051323.47160.rob@landley.net> <200504052255.39254.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> In-Reply-To: <200504052255.39254.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504060059.04907.rob@landley.net> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:59:04 -0400 To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:55 pm, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Speaking of which, I ask this from time to time: > > > > What's the minimal patch set that _just_ adds -SKAS0 mode to something > > like a 2.6.11 kernel? I'd like to try it out, but every time I sit down > > to whack at it my interest budget runs out sifting through a mountain of > > unrelated x86-64 patches to try to figure out what exactly I need to > > apply to get just SKAS0... > > Also, I forgot: during your development work use SKAS. It doesn't give any > big difference visible inside the Virtual Machine (except for bugs). I'm trying out the build on various different systems: knoppix, red hat, suse, debian. In some cases running on borrowed machines, in other cases running on a knoppix boot cd. (I care because I'm using the host tools, which vary slightly from system to system.) You just suggested that I replace the kernels on all of these systems, (including other people's machines, and the bootable CD that uses a kernel with the cloop patch applied and an initramfs that's hard to extract) with a different kernel. Just so I'm testing something faster that's not actually what I'm going to be deploying. If I was going to replace the host kernel and run on a modified system, I'd just A) replace it with the version I actually need, B) run the build as root and use chroot instead of UML. I'm interested in SKAS0 because it's potentially deployable. Any SKAS that requires a modified host kernel is not, for my purposes. Rob ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel