All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Chris Rankin <rankincj@yahoo.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OOPS] 2.6.11 - NMI lockup with CFQ scheduler
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:45:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050407144557.GK1847@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112881183.5842.13.camel@mulgrave>

On Thu, Apr 07 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 15:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I think Christophs point is that why add sdev_lock as a pointer, instead
> > of just killing it? It's only used in one location, so it's not really
> > that confusing (and a comment could fix that).
> 
> Because any use of sdev->request_queue->queue_lock would likely succeed
> even after we've freed the device and released the queue.  If it's a
> pointer and we null it after free and release, then any later use will
> trigger an immediate NULL deref oops.

So clear ->request_queue instead.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-07 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-29 11:54 [OOPS] 2.6.11 - NMI lockup with CFQ scheduler Chris Rankin
2005-03-29 12:03 ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 16:27   ` James Bottomley
2005-04-06 17:58     ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 18:20       ` James Bottomley
2005-04-06 19:08         ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 21:09           ` James Bottomley
2005-04-07  6:49             ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-07 13:18               ` James Bottomley
2005-04-07 13:22                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-07 13:24                   ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-07 13:30                   ` James Bottomley
2005-04-07 13:32                     ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-07 13:39                       ` James Bottomley
2005-04-07 14:45                         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-04-08 13:04                           ` James Bottomley
2005-04-08 13:09                             ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-07 13:24                 ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-29 12:22 Chris Rankin
2005-03-29 12:26 ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 12:31   ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 12:52     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-06 12:55       ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 13:38         ` Tejun Heo
2005-04-06 18:01           ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-06 20:32           ` Mike Anderson
2005-03-27 19:22 Chris Rankin
2005-03-29 11:32 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050407144557.GK1847@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rankincj@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.