From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:41:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050411144127.GE13369@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1113230125.9962.7.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:35:25AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> må den 11.04.2005 Klokka 15:47 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:
>
> > Certainly;
> >
> > http://unthought.net/binary.dmp.bz2
> >
> > I got an 'invalid snaplen' with the 90000 you suggested, the above dump
> > is done with 9000 - if you need another snaplen please just let me know.
>
> So, the RPC itself looks good, but it also looks as if after a while you
> are running into some heavy retransmission problems with TCP too (at the
> TCP level now, instead of at the RPC level). When you get into that
> mode, it looks as if every 2nd or 3rd TCP segment being sent from the
> client is being lost...
Odd...
I'm really sorry for using your time if this ends up being just a
networking problem.
> That can mean either that the server is dropping fragments, or that the
> client is dropping the replies. Can you generate a similar tcpdump on
> the server?
Certainly; http://unthought.net/sparrow.dmp.bz2
--
/ jakob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-11 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-06 16:01 bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-06 21:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-07 15:28 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-06 23:19 ` Greg Banks
2005-04-07 15:38 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-07 16:01 ` Greg Banks
2005-04-07 16:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-09 21:35 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-09 21:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-11 7:48 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-11 12:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-11 13:47 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-11 14:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-11 14:41 ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2005-04-11 15:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-11 15:42 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-12 1:03 ` Greg Banks
2005-04-12 9:28 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-19 19:45 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-19 22:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-20 13:57 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-24 7:15 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-04-25 3:09 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-25 13:50 ` Jakob Oestergaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050411144127.GE13369@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.