All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Cleanest way to deal with loopback interface?
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:35:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050414013525.GA32192@bender.817west.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1113436673.3544.186.camel@seberino.spawar.navy.mil>

On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:57:53PM -0700, Christian Seberino wrote:
> Thank you very much!
> Are you saying that there is no reason for firewalls to check for and
> drop packets addressed to and from 127.0.0.1 because Linux TCP stack
> already drops those automatically?  I didn't know source IP addresses
> were checked by default.  This is almost like a built in 'always on'
> firewalling on Linux!?
> 
> In other words, if I tried to spoof packets to your LAN from 127.0.0.1,
> they would never get through even with no firewalls?

yeah--somewhere around line 1434 of:

  /usr/src/linux-2.4.28/net/ipv4/route.c

on the machine i'm looking at.

-j

--
"Chris: Hi, my name is Chris. Mom and dad said that I'm supposed to be
 on my best behavior tonight and not say "poop". Oh god. What have I
 done?"
        --Family Guy


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-14  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-13 20:50 Cleanest way to deal with loopback interface? Christian Seberino
2005-04-13 21:00 ` Alexander Samad
2005-04-13 21:13 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-13 23:57   ` Christian Seberino
2005-04-14  1:35     ` Jason Opperisano [this message]
2005-04-14  1:32       ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-14  2:43         ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-14  1:09   ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-17 23:27     ` seberino
2005-04-18  0:04       ` Thomas Jones
2005-04-18 20:02         ` Christian Seberino
2005-04-18 20:05           ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-18 21:16           ` Thomas Jones
2005-04-18 20:09     ` Christian Seberino
2005-04-18 20:42       ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-14  1:23 ` Taylor Grant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050414013525.GA32192@bender.817west.com \
    --to=opie@817west.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.