From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"Sergey S. Kostyliov" <rathamahata@ehouse.ru>,
Clem Taylor <clem.taylor@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:28:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050415172816.GU493@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050415172408.GB8511@wotan.suse.de>
* Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:27:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen it in .11 and earlier kernels. Happen to have same
> > "x86_64" string on my bad pmd dumps, but can't reproduce it at all.
> > So, for now, I can hold off on adding the reload cr3 patch to -stable
> > unless you think it should be there anyway.
>
> It is a bug fix (actually there is another related patch that fixes
> a similar bug), but we lived with the problems for years so I guess
> they can wait for .12.
Sounds good.
> If there was a fix for the bad pmd problem it might be a candidate
> for stable, but so far we dont know what causes it yet.
If I figure a way to trigger here, I'll report back.
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-15 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-30 21:44 x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 Dave Jones
2005-03-31 10:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-31 21:52 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-01 11:52 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2005-04-07 2:49 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-07 6:29 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 13:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 17:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 17:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 18:10 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:11 ` x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:27 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-15 17:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-15 17:28 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-04-15 17:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-15 18:07 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-22 17:37 ` Debugging patch was " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 14:23 ` New debugging " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 17:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-29 11:07 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-04-19 13:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-19 15:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-29 11:12 ` Christopher Warner
2005-04-29 16:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-29 17:32 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-02 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-02 15:28 ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-02 20:33 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-02 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-03 14:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-03 15:15 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 9:36 ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:26 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-10 12:03 ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:38 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 16:59 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 20:43 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-12 21:23 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-13 21:51 ` Peter J. Stieber
2005-05-14 17:29 ` Peter J. Stieber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050415172816.GU493@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=clem.taylor@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rathamahata@ehouse.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.