From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/serial/8250_acpi.c: fix a warning Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:59:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20050416085923.A10826@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20050415151053.GM5456@stusta.de> <20050416023852.GI4831@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:41744 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261280AbVDPH7a (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:59:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050416023852.GI4831@stusta.de>; from bunk@stusta.de on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:38:52AM +0200 Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.ne On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:38:52AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > In the Linux kernel, it's more common to put such header dependencies > for header files into the C files, but if the ACPI people agree a patch > to add the #include to acpi_bus.h is the other possble > correct solution for this issue. With the exception of linux/config.h. Do a 'make configcheck' and it'll tell you where linux/config.h is missing and where it shouldn't be. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core