From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wang Jian Subject: Re: [PATCH] ct-event API port to 2.6.11 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:13:43 +0800 Message-ID: <20050418185959.037A.LARK@linux.net.cn> References: <425BE280.3040904@eurodev.net> <42639065.70809@ufomechanic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Pablo Neira , Patrick McHardy Return-path: To: Amin Azez In-Reply-To: <42639065.70809@ufomechanic.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi Amin Azez, Pablo gave a patch the other day that patches pom-ng to get ctevent-api/. I use this patch along with new nfnetlink/ and ctnetlink/, and it works fine. Of course, you need to rename or symbol link ctevent-api/ to conntrack-event-api/, because Harald Welte chooses it as name. Execpt the ctevent-api, I think other parts have been put into new nfnetlink/ and ctnetlink/. Harald Welte also merged ctnetlink-conntrack_acct.patch, which seems to do per stream packets/bytes counting stuff. (I just take a look at it, so I may be wrong). On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:48:05 +0100, Amin Azez wrote: > Pablo Neira wrote: > > Pablo Neira wrote: > > > >> Harald Welte wrote: > >> > >>> do you mind creating a patch against svn so we can put it into > >>> nfnetlink-ctnetlink/linux-2.6.11 ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Attached two patches against pom-ng: > >> > >> o ctevent-api: conntrack event API > >> o nfnetlink-ctnetlink: nfnetlink + conntrack netlink interface > > > > oops, sorry, forgot the patches... > > Can I just check that nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 and > nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.50 in pom-ng-20050404 have been replaced by > pom-ng/nfnetlink and pom-ng/ctnetlink in pom-ng-20050417 > > Pablo, do they also fully supercede your patches 1-5 at > http://people.netfilter.org/~pablo/patches/nfnetlink-conntrack-0.50-2.6.11/ > and that there is nothing new in those? > > If so, do you want me to create a pom-ng for the netlink packet counting > stuff I sent last week, our will you spit that out at an appropriate > point combined with your pattern defined dumping? > > Sam -- lark