From: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
To: paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PATCH [PPC64]: dead processes never reaped
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:38:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050418193833.GW15596@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being lost forever.
Processes that are PF_DEAD are cleaned up *after* the context switch,
in a routine called finish_task_switch(task_t *prev). The "prev" gets
the value returned by _switch() in entry.S, but this value comes from
__switch_to (struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *new)
{
old_thread = ¤t->thread; ///XXX shouldn't this be prev, not current?
last = _switch(old_thread, new_thread);
return last;
}
The way I see it, "prev" and "current" are almost always going to be
pointing at the same thing; however, if a "need resched" happens,
or there's a pre-emept or some-such, then prev and current won't be
the same; in which case, finish_task_switch() will end up cleaning
up the old current, instead of prev. This will result in dead processes
hanging around, which will never be scheduled again, and will never
get a chance to have put_task_struct() called on them.
This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@linas.org>
--- arch/ppc64/kernel/process.c.orig 2005-04-18 14:26:42.000000000 -0500
+++ arch/ppc64/kernel/process.c 2005-04-18 14:27:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
flush_tlb_pending();
new_thread = &new->thread;
- old_thread = ¤t->thread;
+ old_thread = &prev->thread;
local_irq_save(flags);
last = _switch(old_thread, new_thread);
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-18 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-18 19:38 Linas Vepstas [this message]
2005-04-19 1:01 ` PATCH [PPC64]: dead processes never reaped Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-19 17:39 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-04-19 1:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-19 1:25 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 17:22 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-04-20 5:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-05-05 21:57 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050418193833.GW15596@austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.