All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] write-tree performance problems
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:04:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504201504.59541.mason@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504201040400.6467@ppc970.osdl.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --]

On Wednesday 20 April 2005 13:52, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Chris Mason wrote:
> > The patch below with your current tree brings my 100 patch test down to
> > 22 seconds again.
>
> If you ever have a cache_entry bigger than 16384, your code will write
> things out in the wrong order (write the new cache without flushing the
> old buffer).

Whoops

> Finally, if you really want to go fast, you should really try to make your
> writes powers-of-two, ie fill up the buffer entirely rather than saying
> "if I were to overflow, flush it now". It doesn't matter that much for
> some filesystems (especially local and append-only like the patterns are
> here), but it can definitely matter for the stupid ones.

Well, the difference there should be pretty hard to see with any benchmark.
But I was being lazy...new patch attached.  This one gets the same perf 
numbers, if this is still wrong then I really need some more coffee.

-chris


[-- Attachment #2: read-cache-fast.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1410 bytes --]

--- linus.back/read-cache.c	2005-04-20 10:14:23.268310000 -0400
+++ linus/read-cache.c	2005-04-20 14:54:28.554518320 -0400
@@ -232,11 +232,13 @@
 	SHA_CTX c;
 	struct cache_header hdr;
 	int i;
+	#define BUFLEN 16384
+	static char buf[BUFLEN];
+	int len = 0;
 
 	hdr.hdr_signature = htonl(CACHE_SIGNATURE);
 	hdr.hdr_version = htonl(1);
 	hdr.hdr_entries = htonl(entries);
-
 	SHA1_Init(&c);
 	SHA1_Update(&c, &hdr, offsetof(struct cache_header, sha1));
 	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
@@ -246,13 +248,37 @@
 	}
 	SHA1_Final(hdr.sha1, &c);
 
-	if (write(newfd, &hdr, sizeof(hdr)) != sizeof(hdr))
-		return -1;
-
+	/* hdr is small right now, but just
+	 * in case someone changes that...
+	 */
+	if (sizeof(hdr) < BUFLEN) {
+		memcpy(buf, &hdr, sizeof(hdr));
+		len += sizeof(hdr);
+	} else {
+		if (write(newfd, &hdr, sizeof(hdr)) != sizeof(hdr))
+			return -1;
+	}
 	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
 		struct cache_entry *ce = cache[i];
 		int size = ce_size(ce);
-		if (write(newfd, ce, size) != size)
+		char *p = (char *)ce;
+		while(size > 0) {
+			int count = size;
+			if (count > BUFLEN - len)
+				count = BUFLEN - len;
+			memcpy(buf + len, p, count);
+			size -= count;
+			len += count;
+			p += count;
+			if (len == BUFLEN) {
+				if (write(newfd, buf, len) != len)
+					return -1;
+				len = 0;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	if (len) {
+		if (write(newfd, buf, len) != len)
 			return -1;
 	}
 	return 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-20 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-19 16:50 [PATCH] write-tree performance problems Chris Mason
2005-04-19 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 18:11   ` Chris Mason
2005-04-19 19:03     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 21:08       ` Chris Mason
2005-04-19 21:23         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20  0:49           ` Chris Mason
2005-04-20  1:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20  6:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20  7:38               ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-20  9:08                 ` WARNING! Object DB conversion (was Re: [PATCH] write-tree performance problems) Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 10:04                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-20 12:11                   ` Jon Seymour
2005-04-20 13:24                     ` Martin Uecker
2005-04-20 13:35                       ` Morten Welinder
2005-04-20 13:41                       ` Jon Seymour
2005-04-20 14:30                       ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 15:19                         ` Martin Uecker
2005-04-20 15:28                           ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 15:57                             ` Martin Uecker
2005-04-20 16:33                               ` Martin Uecker
2005-04-20 13:30                   ` Blob chunking code. [First look.] C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 17:31                     ` Blob chunking code. [Second look] C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 14:13                   ` WARNING! Object DB conversion (was Re: [PATCH] write-tree performance problems) David Woodhouse
2005-04-20 14:59                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 22:29                       ` David Woodhouse
     [not found]                   ` <2cfc4032050420050655265d3a@mail.gmail.com>
2005-04-20 14:29                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 14:35                       ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 15:22               ` [PATCH] write-tree performance problems Chris Mason
2005-04-20 15:30                 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 15:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 15:52                     ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 16:21                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 15:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 16:10                   ` David Willmore
2005-04-20 16:33                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 16:41                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 16:37                   ` Chris Mason
2005-04-20 17:06                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 17:23                       ` Chris Mason
2005-04-20 17:52                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 19:04                           ` Chris Mason [this message]
2005-04-20 19:19                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 19:47                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 18:07                       ` David S. Miller
2005-04-19 22:09       ` David Lang
2005-04-19 22:21         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 23:00           ` David Lang
2005-04-19 23:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 23:42               ` David Lang
2005-04-19 23:59                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 21:52                   ` Christopher Li
2005-04-19 18:51   ` Olivier Galibert
2005-04-19 22:47   ` C. Scott Ananian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200504201504.59541.mason@suse.com \
    --to=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.