From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Lord Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git' Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <200504212152.OAA07575@emf.net> References: <1114069758.5886.9.camel@perun.redhat.usu> Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 21 23:48:38 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOjWs-0002fn-5k for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:48:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261244AbVDUVwj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:52:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261239AbVDUVwi (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:52:38 -0400 Received: from emf.emf.net ([205.149.0.19]:37380 "EHLO emf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261244AbVDUVwi (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:52:38 -0400 Received: (from lord@localhost) by emf.net (K/K) id OAA07575; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:52:34 -0700 (PDT) To: t8m@centrum.cz In-reply-to: <1114069758.5886.9.camel@perun.redhat.usu> (message from Tomas Mraz on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:49:18 +0200) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > However you're > right that the original structure proposed by Linus is too flat. That was the only point I *meant* to defend. The rest was error. -t