From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D8967AC5 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 03:48:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:42:45 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Joakim Tjernlund Message-ID: <20050423124245.GJ12703@logos.cnet> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [26-devel] v2.6 performance slowdown on MPC8xx: Measuring TLB cache misses List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Joakim, On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 07:23:51PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Now, what is the best way to bring the performance back to v2.4 levels? > > > > For this "dd" test, which is dominated by "sys_read/sys_write", I thought > > of trying to bring the hotpath functions into the same pages, thus > > decreasing the number of page translations required for such tasks. > > > > Comments are appreciated > > Does CONFIG_PIN_TLB make a difference? No it does not.