From: Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
bill.irwin@oracle.com, Scott Parish <srparish@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: understanding __linear_l2_table and friends
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:13:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050423151308.GA17054@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050423150827.GD7715@wotan.suse.de>
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:08:27PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> That is why the PAE effort seems so pointless to me. I estimate it will
> take some months at least until it is stable and released, and at this time
> most of the new x86 world is x86-64 capable.
>
> The only boxes for which PAE is needed are basically some old servers,
> and these will be quickly replaced with new 64bit capable ones.
sorry andi I disagree
"some" is incorrect. there are huge huge numbers of servers outthere,
you don't just replace them. many potential xen users probably have 100s
of relatively recent x86 servers around.
one doesn't just replace servers. maybe at home, but not companies.
if you have a server farm with 4000 systems, you don't just toss it.
I think it's worth the effort
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-23 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-21 13:51 understanding __linear_l2_table and friends Ian Pratt
2005-04-21 19:42 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-04-22 11:04 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 20:47 ` Kip Macy
2005-04-23 15:08 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-23 15:13 ` Wim Coekaerts [this message]
2005-04-23 15:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-24 19:55 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-04-25 0:41 ` David Hopwood
2005-04-25 0:46 ` Mark Williamson
2005-04-25 2:53 ` David Hopwood
2005-04-23 15:20 ` understanding __linear_l2_table and friends II Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-21 21:13 understanding __linear_l2_table and friends Ian Pratt
2005-04-20 20:27 Ian Pratt
2005-04-20 21:38 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-04-20 22:10 ` Ian Pratt
2005-04-20 18:53 Ian Pratt
2005-04-20 19:14 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-04-20 16:25 Ian Pratt
2005-04-20 16:31 ` Keir Fraser
2005-04-19 23:03 Scott Parish
2005-04-20 10:05 ` Keir Fraser
2005-04-20 16:06 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-04-20 19:46 ` Scott Parish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050423151308.GA17054@ca-server1.us.oracle.com \
--to=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bill.irwin@oracle.com \
--cc=kip.macy@gmail.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=srparish@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.