From: David Becker <becker@cs.duke.edu>
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: compute performace problem
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:28:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050424172845.GA9065@cs.duke.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E3D1F@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
" Do you get predictable performance running in domain0?
d'oh I thought of it, and then forgot. Trying it now, 2.0-testing
dom-0 does give consistent run times.
Today I also get consistent times with xen-unstable. Turns out
unstable dom-0 needs more memory than the 2.0 system, so my default
setup was swapping when I tried unstable on Friday. If I give the unstable
dom-0 more memory, xen0 and xenU do run the app with consistent times.
And, if I run the tests in xen0 and xenU simulataneously, cpu time is shared
evenly on unstable and on 2.0. Thats all good.
So the only domains showing the 4x deviation in run time are the 2.0 xenU
domains. I'll have to discuss with the users if we want to upgrade or
investigate 2.0 further. Upgrading Xen is a pretty disruptive task so
close to the end of the term, so I may end up figuring out whats going
on in 2.0 anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-24 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-23 21:17 compute performace problem Ian Pratt
2005-04-24 17:28 ` David Becker [this message]
2005-04-24 17:54 ` Keir Fraser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-23 14:52 David Becker
2005-04-23 15:06 ` Steven Hand
2005-04-23 15:14 ` Keir Fraser
2005-04-23 15:12 ` Keir Fraser
2005-04-23 16:50 ` David Becker
2005-04-23 17:53 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050424172845.GA9065@cs.duke.edu \
--to=becker@cs.duke.edu \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.