All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerhard Schrenk <gps@mittelerde.physik.uni-konstanz.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A shortcoming of the git repo format
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:58:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050427205812.GA4412@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426F2671.1080105@zytor.com>

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> [2005-04-27 07:43]:
> Most of git's files are starting to converge toward an RFC822-like 
> header with (tag, data) and a free-form section.  This is a good
> thing.

I really hate RFC822-like data structures. Why? Lazy straightforward
people (who have written to much mails) tend to break the relational
data
modell and don't realize what they loose. Usually they introduce
non-atomar tags like

Tag: value1, value2

and game over. You have just broken the first normal form (1NF). In the 
end the relational normalization process is just not to break the
functional dependencies of your data. It's worth it.

I'm reacting like pawlov's dog and really don't know what I'm talking
about (namely git). But please don't do the same error and just
associate
relational = sql = crap. The shell's operator stream paradigma fits very
good to the relational modell. It's certainly closer to the relational
algebra than sql...

Take care
Gerhard


      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-27 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-27  5:43 A shortcoming of the git repo format H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 15:00 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-27 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-27 18:03   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 18:32     ` Dave Jones
2005-04-27 18:47       ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 22:51         ` Jon Seymour
2005-04-27 19:15       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-27 19:39       ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-27 19:11     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-27 19:47       ` The " Brian O'Mahoney
2005-04-27 20:40       ` A shortcoming of the " H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 20:49         ` Tom Lord
2005-04-27 20:59           ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-28  0:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28  1:34             ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-28  2:14             ` Tom Lord
2005-04-28  3:37             ` Ryan Anderson
2005-04-28  8:31             ` Morgan Schweers
2005-04-28 15:08             ` Barry Silverman
2005-04-27 20:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28  0:45           ` David A. Wheeler
2005-04-28  0:46             ` David Lang
2005-04-27 23:50         ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-27 23:56           ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-28  1:51             ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-28  1:56               ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-28 13:39     ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-27 20:58 ` Gerhard Schrenk [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050427205812.GA4412@frodo \
    --to=gps@mittelerde.physik.uni-konstanz.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.