From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DS6bI-0005ya-F0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 01:02:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DS6bH-0005y6-F0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 01:02:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DS6bH-0005fs-AM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 01:02:39 -0400 Received: from [24.201.245.36] (helo=relais.videotron.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DS6a2-0004r6-IK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 01:01:22 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.80.139.21]) by VL-MO-MR010.ip.videotron.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IFS009NIOF45M@VL-MO-MR010.ip.videotron.ca> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 00:57:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 00:58:19 -0400 From: Marc Collin Message-id: <200505010058.19675.collinm@laboiteaprog.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] target... Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org hi when we do a ./configure for qemu there is: target list i386-user arm-user armeb-user sparc-user ppc-user i386-softmmu ppc-softmmu sparc-softmmu x86_64-softmmu for a x86 machine, what is the best for performance? i386-user or i386-softmmu thanks -- www.laboiteaprog.com