From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DUvOJ-00055v-GD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 19:40:55 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DUvK3-00046l-E6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 19:36:37 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUvJy-00040x-7P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 19:36:26 -0400
Received: from [24.201.245.36] (helo=relais.videotron.ca)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DUv0W-0007IW-I7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 19:16:20 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.80.139.21]) by VL-MO-MR010.ip.videotron.ca
	(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
	with ESMTP id <0IG7002FQ1P374@VL-MO-MR010.ip.videotron.ca> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 19:10:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 19:12:28 -0400
From: Marc Collin <collinm@laboiteaprog.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?
In-reply-to: <427E9557.7020107@praguespringpeople.org>
Message-id: <200505081912.29249.collinm@laboiteaprog.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-disposition: inline
References: <200505081536.56882.collinm@laboiteaprog.com>
	<200505081712.53846.collinm@laboiteaprog.com>
	<427E9557.7020107@praguespringpeople.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Le 8 Mai 2005 18:40, Struan Bartlett a =E9crit=A0:
> Marc Collin wrote:
> >Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, Andr=E9 Braga a =E9crit :
> >>Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
> >
> >0 means kqemu is ok?
>
> I don't think so. The way I see it, when I'm running _one_ instance of
> QEMU, lsmod lists:
>
> kqemu                  43428  2
>
> When I run QEMU with the '-no-kqemu' option lsmod lists:
>
> kqemu                  43428  0
>
> Struan
>
>
>

i use suse 9.3 with kernel: 2.6.11.4 maybe kqemu don't support it?

=2D-=20
www.laboiteaprog.com