From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DUxh1-00062o-HT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 22:08:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DUxgr-0005xF-Co
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 22:08:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUxgp-0005r4-4x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 22:08:11 -0400
Received: from [62.89.75.144] (helo=bozon2.softax.com.pl)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DUxTm-0005ng-DM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 21:54:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bozon2.softax.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB05FDC32B
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon,  9 May 2005 03:48:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bozon2.softax.com.pl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bozon2.softax.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 12363-20 for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>;
	Mon,  9 May 2005 03:48:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zdzicha.k.local (dli52.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.24.38.52])
	by bozon2.softax.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5346EDC326
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon,  9 May 2005 03:48:34 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Sebastian Kaliszewski <sk@z.pl>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Stupid (probably) idea wrt dyngen & gcc 3.4 & 4.0
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 03:55:24 +0200
References: <200505090202.00547.sk@z.pl> <200505090140.57249.paul@nowt.org>
In-Reply-To: <200505090140.57249.paul@nowt.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200505090355.24247.sk@z.pl>
Reply-To: sk@z.pl, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

So the idea was indeed stupid :)

On Monday 09 May 2005 02:40, Paul Brook wrote:
> No. The main problem with gcc3.4 was that we weren't using FORCE_RET
> everywhere that we should. This has mostly been fixed now.

I see...

[snip]
>
> I've got a solution for x86/x86-64 that's 95% complete, using the metho=
d
> I suggested in a previous email.=20

So, since ret is too small to be replaced with jump, you relocate the blo=
ck=20
following ret few bytes further, and retarget all relevant jumps?

> I hope to be submitting a patch shortly.
> I expect most other hosts (particularly the RISC based ones) to be much
> simpler to fix.

Nice.

rgds
Sebastian Kaliszewski