From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261441AbVEJIv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 04:51:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261586AbVEJIv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 04:51:56 -0400 Received: from ipx10786.ipxserver.de ([80.190.251.108]:63133 "EHLO allen.werkleitz.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261441AbVEJIvx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 04:51:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:52:10 +0200 From: Johannes Stezenbach To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20050510085210.GA17601@linuxtv.org> Mail-Followup-To: Johannes Stezenbach , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050508184229.957247000@abc> <20050509180411.6cff1941.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050509180411.6cff1941.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.231.53.1 Subject: Re: [DVB patch 00/37] DVB updates for 2.6.12-rc4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on allen.werkleitz.de) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 09, 2005 Andrew Morton wrote: > Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > here are a bunch of patches from linuxtv.org CVS. Nothing > > exciting, just bugfixes, cleanups and support for a number > > of new card variants. > > Do you view this as 2.6.12 material? Yes, all of it is well tested and has been in CVS for a while. > I notice that Greg's tree changes dvb_class to be of type class_simple, so > there may be interactions between your stuff and > gregkh-01-driver-gregkh-driver-022_class-11-drivers.patch. We'll see. OK, I'll check that. > I notice you have a lot of things like: > > Switch analog output of the Crystal sound chip to left/stereo/right mode. > This will fix problems with some (most?) channels which do not encode 2-channel > audio correctly. (Oliver Endriss) > > In future, please try to gather Signed-off-by: lines for these > contributions, thanks. How should we handle this with CVS? Should people add a Signed-off-by: line to the CVS commit log? If they don't, can I assume that "by policy" the Signed-off-by: line for the committer is implicit? Or do I have to bug them to mail me the Signed-off-by: line? Thanks, Johannes