All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
	wwc@rentec.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 4520] New: /proc/*/maps fragments too quickly compared to
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:07:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050510190708.GA32007@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050510115818.0828f5d1.akpm@osdl.org>

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:58:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote on Monday, May 09, 2005 2:27 PM
> > > Possibly for the 2.6.12 release the safest approach would be to just
> > > disable the free area cache while we think about it.
> > 
> > I hope people are not thinking permanently kill the free area cache
> > algorithm.  It is known to give a large percentage of performance gain
> > on specweb SSL benchmark.  I think it gives 4-5% gain from free area
> > cache algorithm.
> 
> It also makes previously-working workloads completely *fail*.

the balance between correctness and performance ;)

the patch to keep track of basically the below-gap-size will fix the
correctness side I suppose, however I'm not sure I'm thrilled by the
inherent complexity that is beeing added. More to track means more
complexity and fragility. 
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-10 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-09 13:30 Fw: [Bug 4520] New: /proc/*/maps fragments too quickly compared to Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-09 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-09 21:30   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-10 13:23     ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-10 15:35   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-10 18:58     ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-10 19:07       ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-05-10 19:34       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-10 19:43         ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-10 19:50           ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-10 19:57             ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-11 14:36               ` [PATCH] Avoiding mmap fragmentation (against 2.6.12-rc4) to Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-11 15:05                 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-12  0:59                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-12  1:33                   ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-12  7:07                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-12  7:14                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-10 19:58             ` Fw: [Bug 4520] New: /proc/*/maps fragments too quickly compared to Ingo Molnar
2005-05-10 20:04               ` Wolfgang Wander

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050510190708.GA32007@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=wwc@rentec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.