From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrei Petrov Subject: Re: x86_64 build patch Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:16:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20050512171613.GA9301@ezzy.veritas.com> References: <20050511215405.GA7195@ezzy.veritas.com> <1115902357.3783.5.camel@ibm-iltllzhf48d-009053094152.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1115902357.3783.5.camel@ibm-iltllzhf48d-009053094152.austin.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: David F Barrera Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:52:37AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote: > > I am assuming your patch was not included in the source yet, so I tried > applying your patch, but it failed: > > bl2-2:/tmp/xen-unstable/xen # patch -p1 < /skyline/barrera/x86_64.patch > patching file arch/x86/acpi/boot.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 41. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > arch/x86/acpi/boot.c.rej > > If your patch *was* included in the May 11 source, then it may be the > cause of the break. > > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 14:54 -0700, Andrei Petrov wrote: > > This patch makes recent unstable buildable on x86_64. > > > > --- xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c.orig 2005-05-11 09:54:27.000000000 -0700 > > +++ xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c 2005-05-11 14:48:37.000000000 -0700 That's because of -p1, i think, i made the patch from inside source tree, probably bad idea, anyway that doesn't matter as the fix is in tree now.