From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/sched.c: remove two unused functions
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 02:47:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050513004716.GR3603@stusta.de> (raw)
This patch removes the unused functions wait_for_completion_timeout and
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout.
Is any usage for them planned or is this patch OK?
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 7 May 2005
include/linux/completion.h | 4 --
kernel/sched.c | 66 -------------------------------------
2 files changed, 70 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm2-full/include/linux/completion.h.old 2005-05-03 07:52:14.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm2-full/include/linux/completion.h 2005-05-03 07:52:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -29,10 +29,6 @@
extern void FASTCALL(wait_for_completion(struct completion *));
extern int FASTCALL(wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x));
-extern unsigned long FASTCALL(wait_for_completion_timeout(struct completion *x,
- unsigned long timeout));
-extern unsigned long FASTCALL(wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
- struct completion *x, unsigned long timeout));
extern void FASTCALL(complete(struct completion *));
extern void FASTCALL(complete_all(struct completion *));
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm2-full/kernel/sched.c.old 2005-05-03 07:52:42.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm2-full/kernel/sched.c 2005-05-03 07:53:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -3146,36 +3146,6 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_for_completion);
-unsigned long fastcall __sched
-wait_for_completion_timeout(struct completion *x, unsigned long timeout)
-{
- might_sleep();
-
- spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- if (!x->done) {
- DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
- wait.flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
- __add_wait_queue_tail(&x->wait, &wait);
- do {
- __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
- spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- if (!timeout) {
- __remove_wait_queue(&x->wait, &wait);
- goto out;
- }
- } while (!x->done);
- __remove_wait_queue(&x->wait, &wait);
- }
- x->done--;
-out:
- spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- return timeout;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_for_completion_timeout);
-
int fastcall __sched wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -3209,42 +3179,6 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_for_completion_interruptible);
-unsigned long fastcall __sched
-wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(struct completion *x,
- unsigned long timeout)
-{
- might_sleep();
-
- spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- if (!x->done) {
- DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
- wait.flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
- __add_wait_queue_tail(&x->wait, &wait);
- do {
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- timeout = -ERESTARTSYS;
- __remove_wait_queue(&x->wait, &wait);
- goto out;
- }
- __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
- spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- if (!timeout) {
- __remove_wait_queue(&x->wait, &wait);
- goto out;
- }
- } while (!x->done);
- __remove_wait_queue(&x->wait, &wait);
- }
- x->done--;
-out:
- spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock);
- return timeout;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout);
-
#define SLEEP_ON_VAR \
unsigned long flags; \
next reply other threads:[~2005-05-13 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-13 0:47 Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-05-13 6:48 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/sched.c: remove two unused functions Ingo Molnar
2005-05-14 5:35 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-06 22:20 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050513004716.GR3603@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.