From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@yahoo.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Sander <sander@humilis.net>,
David Hollis <dhollis@davehollis.com>,
Maciej Soltysiak <solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: ata over ethernet question
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:16:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050513081617.GC32546@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1115927058.25161.166.camel@beastie>
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:44:18PM -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
> i'm just reacting on "bloated" wording. It really depends on
> implementation and design. If you were talking about amount of code in
> the kernel, than take a look on open-iscsi(just one file iscsi_tcp.c)
> and IET where we doing a lot of management stuff in user-space. It is
> not that much code in the kernel, really, but it is doing x10 times more
> useful things comparing to nbd and yet compliant with RFC.
Keeping code out of the kernel is really nice, but that doesn't meant it
isn't bloat - the bloat is just in userland.
> yeah, generic transport, recovery levels, direct data placement for HW
> HBAs, etc, etc... it is all *must* features for enterprise's SAN
> deployment. So, yes, there is a price as usual.
I'm sure your marketing department can use all these buzzwords to sell
NICs to CTOs and CEOs, but else..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-13 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 17:31 ata over ethernet question Maciej Soltysiak
2005-05-04 19:48 ` David Hollis
2005-05-04 21:17 ` Re[2]: " Maciej Soltysiak
2005-05-05 14:42 ` Raf D'Halleweyn
2005-05-05 15:09 ` David Hollis
2005-05-07 15:05 ` Sander
2005-05-10 22:00 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-10 23:14 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-11 5:42 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " FUJITA Tomonori
2005-05-11 8:56 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-11 21:26 ` several messages Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-12 2:16 ` Ming Zhang
2005-05-12 18:32 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 15:04 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 15:38 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-12 10:17 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-12 19:42 ` SCSI/ISCSI, hardware/software Bryan Henderson
2005-05-13 4:55 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-05-13 10:34 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-13 23:58 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-05-13 23:58 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-05-12 18:52 ` Re[2]: ata over ethernet question James Bottomley
2005-05-12 19:05 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-12 19:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-12 19:44 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-05-13 16:18 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 18:50 ` iSCSI vs. NBD (was Re: ata over ethernet question) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-13 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-13 22:49 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-25 23:41 ` NBD (vs. iSCSI vs. EATA vs...) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-26 1:19 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-26 17:48 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-05 14:46 ` ata over ethernet question Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050513081617.GC32546@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=dhollis@davehollis.com \
--cc=dmitry_yus@yahoo.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sander@humilis.net \
--cc=solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.