From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Young Koh <young.koh@gmail.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] The UML scheduler
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:06:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050516150648.GB4977@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3524bf1f05051607306756dcfc@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:30:33AM -0400, Young Koh wrote:
> suppose there are 2 processes on top of UML and 3 host processes.
> then, the host kernel sees 5 processes total, so, each of the process
> will get 20% of the CPU time? is that right?
In tt mode, there will be 5 processes, but it will be difficult for the 2 UML
processes to each get 20% of the time, since only one of them will be runnable
at a time on the host. This is still unfair because each of them will have
a higher dynamic priority than the 3 host processes because they are each only
runnable half the time.
In skas mode, there is only one host process for all of the UML processes.
> Or, UML is somehow viewed as a group of processes and UML get 25% of
> the CPU and each UML got 12.5% of the CPU time? if so, how is it
> possible?
In skas mode, this is true.
> one more question, when the UML kernel wants to schedule its
> processes, how does it preempt UML processes?
The same way as any other architecture. A timer tick comes in, and the
timer handler calls schedule().
> this way of scheduling and preemption will be different from TT mode
> and SKAS mode? if so, how?
No, exactly the same.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-16 14:30 [uml-devel] The UML scheduler Young Koh
2005-05-16 15:06 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2005-05-16 15:37 ` Young Koh
2005-05-16 16:58 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050516150648.GB4977@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=young.koh@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.