From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus Törnqvist)
To: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, AndrewMorton <akpm@osdl.org>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:30:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050518113016.GL1399@nysv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17033.62480.218289.246488@fisica.ufpr.br>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 574 bytes --]
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:39:28AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>That's a pity. What's more important however is that this misfeature
>of the scheduler should be corrected ASAP. The nice control is a
>traditional UNIX characteristic and it should have higher priority in
>the patch inclusion queue than other scheduler improvements.
Linux is not a traditional unix, but it doesn't mean the support
shouldn't exist.
My suggestion is that whoever broke the interface, rendering
con's patch which mingo accepted useless, merge the patch.
Thanks!
--
mjt
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-18 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-07 13:42 [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP Con Kolivas
2005-05-07 17:59 ` Carlos Carvalho
2005-05-07 21:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-09 11:24 ` Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-09 11:28 ` [ck] " Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-09 11:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-09 18:55 ` Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-09 23:54 ` Carlos Carvalho
2005-05-11 2:56 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-11 3:04 ` [SMP NICE] [PATCH 1/2] SCHED: Implement " Con Kolivas
2005-05-11 3:05 ` [SMP NICE] [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: Make SMP nice a config option Con Kolivas
2005-05-11 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-12 10:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-16 11:33 ` [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP Con Kolivas
2005-05-16 18:31 ` Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-17 13:39 ` Carlos Carvalho
2005-05-18 11:30 ` Markus Törnqvist [this message]
2005-05-18 13:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-21 5:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-23 9:28 ` [PATCH] SCHED: change_prio_bias_only_if_queued Con Kolivas
2005-05-23 10:07 ` [PATCH] SCHED: account_rt_tasks_in_prio_bias Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050518113016.GL1399@nysv.org \
--to=mjt@nysv.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=carlos@fisica.ufpr.br \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.