From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) Subject: Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:56:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20050518185637.GA24549@snarc.org> References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD542CDB3@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20050517181435.GH27549@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20050518101515.GA22028@snarc.org> <20050518165331.GS27549@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050518165331.GS27549@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Chris Wright Cc: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Mark Williamson , Vincent Hanquez List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:53:31AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > Do you have a list of more of the consolidation/cleanups like the > user_mode/user_mode_vm bits that you sent upstream? For the moment nothing to submit that won't be too xen specific. If you have any ideas however, feel free to submit it. -- Vincent Hanquez