From: Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: ak@suse.de, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, len.brown@intel.com,
bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com
Subject: [patch 1/1] Avoid wasting IRQs for PCI devices (i386)
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:55:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050521085543.489D62732C@linux.site> (raw)
I have submitted the patch for x86_64, this is submission for i386.
<--snip-->
The patch changes the way IRQs are handed out to PCI devices. Currently, each I/O APIC pin gets associated
with an IRQ, no matter if the pin is used or not. This imposes severe limitation on systems that have designs
that employ many I/O APICs, only utilizing couple lines of each, such as P64H2 chipset. It is used in ES7000,
and currently, there is no way to boot the system with more that 9 I/O APICs. The simple change below allows
to boot a system with say 64 (or more) I/O APICs, each providing 1 slot, which otherwise impossible because of
the IRQ gaps created for unused lines on each I/O APIC. It does not resolve the problem with number of devices
that exceeds number of possible IRQs, but eases up a tension for IRQs on any large system with potentually large
number of devices.
Signed-off-by: Natalie Protasevich <Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com>
---
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c~irq-pack-i386 arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc4-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c~irq-pack-i386 2005-05-20 02:10:04.046408256 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc4-mm2-root/arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c 2005-05-20 22:41:48.178272472 -0700
@@ -1056,11 +1056,20 @@ void __init mp_config_acpi_legacy_irqs (
}
}
+#define MAX_GSI_NUM 4096
+
int mp_register_gsi (u32 gsi, int edge_level, int active_high_low)
{
int ioapic = -1;
int ioapic_pin = 0;
int idx, bit = 0;
+ static int pci_irq = 16;
+ /*
+ * Mapping between Global System Interrups, which
+ * represent all possible interrupts, and IRQs
+ * assigned to actual devices.
+ */
+ static int gsi_to_irq[MAX_GSI_NUM];
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_BUS
/* Don't set up the ACPI SCI because it's already set up */
@@ -1095,11 +1104,26 @@ int mp_register_gsi (u32 gsi, int edge_l
if ((1<<bit) & mp_ioapic_routing[ioapic].pin_programmed[idx]) {
Dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "Pin %d-%d already programmed\n",
mp_ioapic_routing[ioapic].apic_id, ioapic_pin);
- return gsi;
+ return gsi_to_irq[gsi];
}
mp_ioapic_routing[ioapic].pin_programmed[idx] |= (1<<bit);
+ if (edge_level) {
+ /*
+ * For PCI devices assign IRQs in order, avoiding gaps
+ * due to unused I/O APIC pins.
+ */
+ int irq = gsi;
+ if (gsi < MAX_GSI_NUM) {
+ gsi = pci_irq++;
+ gsi_to_irq[irq] = gsi;
+ } else {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "GSI %u is too high\n", gsi);
+ return gsi;
+ }
+ }
+
io_apic_set_pci_routing(ioapic, ioapic_pin, gsi,
edge_level == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1,
active_high_low == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
_
reply other threads:[~2005-05-22 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050521085543.489D62732C@linux.site \
--to=natalie.protasevich@unisys.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.