All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] Hard disk LBA sector count is not always the same
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 09:14:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050524071407.GA60@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42925760.9010603@vc.cvut.cz>

    Hi Petr :)

    Thanks for your answer :)

 * Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz> dixit:
> >>DervishD wrote:
> >>>  current capacity is 156299375
> >>>  native capacity is 156301488
> >>Hard drives have a feature that can reserve a certain amount of space 
> >>away from the user.
> >    Yes, I know, but the problem is that 2.4 kernels *does* reserve
> >that space but 2.6 certainly not, and if I boot into 2.6 and then
> >reboot into 2.4, then 2.4 *does NOT* reserve that space.
> Yes.  It is normal...

    I'm surprised :??? Does 2.6 'stroking' by default? I supposed
that maybe Debian people had activated stroking...
 
> >    See the paragraph above: if I partition the disk under 2.6 the
> >partition will have a bigger address than the one that will be
> >available under 2.4, and that can give errors while accessing that
> >extra sectors. What can I do? For technical limitations in my box, I
> >have to use 2.6 for repartitioning that disk (and I will be doing
> >that in less than a month) and this will lead to unaccesible sectors
> >when I boot back into my usual 2.4 kernel :(
> (1) You do not have to create partition over full disk.

    I would prefer to do it. Otherwise I have to calculate where the
partition must end in order to not disturb the kernel. Moreover, in
that space will go the swap partition, probably...
 
> (2) If you'll build your 2.4.x kernel with CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE=y
> ('Auto-Geometry Resizing support'), I bet that your problems with 2.4.x
> kernels disappear.

    I'll try right now... YES, it works!. I don't understand, my BIOS
is AMI, not Awards, and I assumed that the stroke option was used
only for Awards BIOS'es. I've looked at the code in the kernel and it
doesn't seem to be particular for Award :?? It should be specified in
the documentation.

    Thanks a lot for your suggestion and for solving my problem :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...

      reply	other threads:[~2005-05-24  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-23 12:14 [RESEND] Hard disk LBA sector count is not always the same DervishD
2005-05-23 18:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-23 20:02   ` DervishD
2005-05-23 22:21     ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-05-24  7:14       ` DervishD [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050524071407.GA60@DervishD \
    --to=lkml@dervishd.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.