From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe
Date: 24 May 2005 20:15:25 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:15:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050524181525.GF86233@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050524101532.GA27215@in.ibm.com>
> @@ -55,6 +61,9 @@ struct kprobe {
> /* list of kprobes for multi-handler support */
> struct list_head list;
>
> + /*count the number of times this probe was temporarily disarmed */
> + unsigned long nmissed;
You declare a variable.
> +
> /* location of the probe point */
> kprobe_opcode_t *addr;
>
> diff -puN kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-temporary-disarming-on-reentrancy-generic kernel/kprobes.c
> --- linux-2.6.12-rc4-mm2/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-temporary-disarming-on-reentrancy-generic 2005-05-24 15:28:08.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.12-rc4-mm2-prasanna/kernel/kprobes.c 2005-05-24 15:28:08.000000000 +0530
> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> }
> spin_lock_irqsave(&kprobe_lock, flags);
> old_p = get_kprobe(p->addr);
> + p->nmissed = 0;
And then you set it to 0.
And nothing more. Surely this patch does not do anything. Looks like
some code is missing.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-24 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-24 10:15 [PATCH 1/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-05-24 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe for i386 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-05-24 10:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe for x86_64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-05-24 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe for ppc64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-05-24 10:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe for sparc64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-05-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe for x86_64 Andi Kleen
2005-05-25 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe for i386 Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 18:15 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-05-24 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] Kprobes: Temporary disarming of reentrant probe Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050524181525.GF86233@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.