From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 00/03] cfq: various fixes
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:34:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050525073429.GA13068@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050524163518.0DA61D6C@htj.dyndns.org>
On Wed, May 25 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jens.
>
> This patchset is various fixes to cfq. All patches are against
> 2.6.12-rc4-mm2.
>
> One thing that isn't fixed in this patchset but I think might be
> problematic is the priority of async queue. It seems that the async
> queue doesn't receive any special attention regarding its priority.
> It just follows normal rules and its priority jumps irregularly.
> If I'm missing something, plz point out.
>
> [ Start of patch descriptions ]
>
> 01_cfq_INSERT_BACK_fix.patch
> : cfq ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK fix
>
> When inserting INSERT_BACK request, cfq_insert_request() calls
> cfq_dispatch_requests() repetitively until it returns zero
> indicating no request is dispatched. This used to flush all
> the requests in the queue to the dispatch queue but, with idle
> slice implemented, the current active queue may decide to wait
> for new request using slice_timer. When this happens, 0 is
> returned from cfq_dispatch_requests() even when other cfqq's
> have pending requests. This breaks INSRET_BACK semantics.
>
> This patch adds @force argument which, when set to non-zero,
> disables idle_slice, and uses the argument when flushing
> cfqq's for INSERT_BACK. While at it, use INT_MAX instead of
> cfq_quantum when flushing cfqq's, as we're gonna dump all the
> requests and using cfq_quantum does nothing but adding
> unnecessary iterations.
>
> 02_cfq_ioc_leak_fix.patch
> : cfq_io_context leak fix
>
> When a process has more than one cic's associated with it,
> only the first one was kmem_cache_free'd in the original code.
> This patch frees all cic's in cfq_free_io_context().
>
> While at it, remove unnecessary refcounting from cic's to ioc.
> This reference is created when each cic is created and removed
> altogether when the ioc is exited, and, thus, serves no
> purpose.
>
> 03_cfq_remove_unused_fields.patch
> : remove serveral unused fields from cfq data structures
>
> cfq_data->idle_start, cfq_data->end_prio and cfq_rq->end_pos
> are not used in meaningful way. Remove'em.
All three patches look good, thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-25 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-24 16:35 [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 00/03] cfq: various fixes Tejun Heo
2005-05-24 16:35 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 01/03] cfq: cfq ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK fix Tejun Heo
2005-05-24 16:35 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 02/03] cfq: cfq_io_context leak fix Tejun Heo
2005-05-24 16:35 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 03/03] cfq: remove serveral unused fields from cfq data structures Tejun Heo
2005-05-25 7:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050525073429.GA13068@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.