From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Genapic Date: 25 May 2005 17:21:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20050525152147.GC86087@muc.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:21:47 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Natasha Jarymowycz , "Subrahmanian, Raj" , "Davis, Jason" , "Vessey, Bruce A" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:58:56PM -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote: > I am fine with going down the x86_64 genapic route for Xen. The only > thing is that I know that IRQ overrides are not present in the x86_64 > genapic. So that might have to be brought over for the ES7000. AFAIK an es7000 with EM64T CPUs works on x86-64. So it is probably not needed if you would follow what a real Linux kernel is doing. But of course most of the hypervisor codebase is still 2.4-sometime-ancient so you might run into many more problems there. I suspect they are not related to genapic though. -Andi