Re: [RFC] Module language syntax

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>]

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:54:26PM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:53 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:17:33PM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> > 
> > > installation. The production environment then does not need a build
> > > environment such as make, m4 and so on. The module tools will allow
> > > these modules to be "linked in" to the current policy. It's at this link
> > > time that both the modules dependencies and the optional dependencies
> > > are determined and optionals with fulfilled dependencies are enabled.
> >  
> >  i take it that booleans are ... just... added / supported, too?
> > 
> >  such that they are declared in the binary module, used in the binary
> >  module, added to the config files and can be set at runtime, yes/
> > 
> >  l.
> > 
> 
> booleans and conditionals are runtime and are not at all affected by the
> loadable modules. 


 great!  ... just checkin :)


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.