Re: bitopts functions overflowing page boundarys

["Scott Parish" <srparish@us.ibm.com>]

On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:51:06AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:

> 
> On 28 May 2005, at 10:04, Scott Parish wrote:
> 
> >o problem when dom0_mem is less then 2048K; at exactly 2048 we hit
> >the next sized "order" which can't be fulfilled from the 0x100-0xdff60
> >range. All initial allocation for dom0 that i've seen that fall in the
> >"usable" above the hole have the problem i described.
> >
> >Setting,
> >
> >  max_page = init_e820(e820_raw, &e820_raw_nr) - 1;
> >
> >seems to unravel a number of things. shall i preceed to figure out
> >what all, or is such still needed?
> 
> No, I guess this situation just isn't as unlikely as I though it would 
> be. :-)
> 
> I checked in a fixed up bitops.h that should fix the problem for you 
> without needing new bitop functions.

splendid!

sRp

-- 
Scott Parish
Signed-off-by: srparish@us.ibm.com