All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
Cc: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
Date: 31 May 2005 11:23:58 +0200
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:23:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050531092358.GA9372@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505311215.06495.vda@ilport.com.ua>

> Thus with "normal" page clear and "nt" page copy routines
> both clear and copy benchmarks run faster than with
> stock kernel, both with small and large working set.
> 
> Am I wrong?

fork is only a corner case. The main case is a process allocating
memory using brk/mmap and then using it.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-31  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-30 18:16 [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page Benjamin LaHaise
2005-05-30 18:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 19:06 ` dean gaudet
2005-05-30 19:11   ` dean gaudet
2005-05-30 19:32     ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-31  8:37       ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-05-31  9:15         ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-05-31  9:23           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-05-31 13:59             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-06-01  6:22               ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-01  6:47                 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-01  7:22             ` michael
2005-06-01  7:48               ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-01  7:48               ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-01 21:46                 ` dean gaudet
2005-06-01  8:01               ` Nick Piggin
2005-05-30 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-30 20:05   ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-30 20:14     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-05-30 20:42       ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-31  7:11     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050531092358.GA9372@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vda@ilport.com.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.