From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Knorr Subject: Re: network (irq?) problems in unstable Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:18:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20050531101851.GB22211@bytesex> References: <20050530125247.GA12140@bytesex> <61adb21cca3abe8c474f66040037da6a@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61adb21cca3abe8c474f66040037da6a@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > looking at boot-time output of Xen vs. native Linux. Also, particularly > if you have a null modem cable attached, add tracing on a debug key to > see what Xen thinks the status of each IRQ line is (disabled, > in_progress, etc.). Managing IRQ lines via legacy PIC is pretty > straightforward so this can't really be that hard a bug to fix I think > (hope). :-) (XEN) IRQ states: (XEN) 0: (XEN) 1: guest (XEN) 2: (XEN) 4: inprogress (XEN) 5: guest (XEN) 9: guest (XEN) 11: guest No change before and after network freeze (#11 is the nic). Hmm. Gerd -- -mm seems unusually stable at present. -- akpm about 2.6.12-rc3-mm3