From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261479AbVFCBju (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:39:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261481AbVFCBju (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:39:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:29897 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261479AbVFCBjs (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:39:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:39:46 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com Subject: Re: Support multiply-LUN devices in ub Message-Id: <20050602183946.035651ca.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20050602193715.GA1860@kroah.com> References: <20050501160540.5b2f4e61.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20050502230452.GA5186@kroah.com> <20050602095651.351eca48.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20050602193715.GA1860@kroah.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.9 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:37:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > It's showing up in the -mm tree, right? I held off sending this to > Linus as I thought it didn't fit into the "bugfix" only type of patch > that we should be sending so late in the -rc series. Granted the -rc > series is taking forever... Yes, I take it into account when Linus or Marcelo ask to hold features. In this case, however, it was ready for the immediate post-2.6.11 develoment window and due to unfortunate circumstances it missed that window. I do not claim that it's a bugfix, and I'm not shameless enough to ask this in 2.6.11.X. > So, do you want me to push it to him now? It's your choice. I think it's better. -- Pete