From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:44:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050606074458.GA11875@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0506050830050.23583-100000@dhcp153.mvista.com>
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> For me it's strictly a speed question. I was reviewing
> V0.7.40-04 and it looks like apples and oranges to me. It's more a
> question of where do you perfer the latency , in up() or in down() ..
> plist is slower for non-RT tasks, but non-RT tasks also get the
> benefit of priority ordering.
what benefit do non-RT tasks get from plists, compared to the ordered
list? Non-RT tasks are not PI handled in any way.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-06 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-05 0:17 patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 0:53 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 2:33 ` Plist cleanup on RT Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 8:32 ` patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 10:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 7:58 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-05 8:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 8:42 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-05 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-05 9:00 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-05 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-05 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 8:26 ` [patch] " Ingo Molnar
2005-06-05 8:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 9:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-05 15:08 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 8:54 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-05 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-05 14:35 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-06 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-06 8:57 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-06 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-06 15:04 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 14:51 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 15:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-05 15:21 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 15:02 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-05 16:29 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-06 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-06-06 14:49 ` Daniel Walker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-06 7:44 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-06-06 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-06 14:56 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050606074458.GA11875@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.