From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: tools target for SLES9 SP2 and RHEL4 U2 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:47:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20050610104711.GC20162@marowsky-bree.de> References: <1118341002.14457.23.camel@zezette> <20050609191541.GO15809@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <20050610061033.GA9474@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050610061033.GA9474@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 2005-06-09T23:10:33, Mike Anderson wrote: > > > Should we stabilize a 0.4.5 out of the git head > > Yes - both distributions are basing their next package on your=20 > > current git head. > What about multipathd's use of uevents for dm updates and the distro > kernels currently not supporting this capability. Will a person just ha= ve > to restart multipathd if one changes the dm config and a newer kernel i= s > not being used? We'll need a workaround for that, or back it out for our distribution and go back to the signal version... Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"