From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: subbie subbie <subbie_subbie@yahoo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: optional delay after partition detection at boot time
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:17:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050613041705.GD8907@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506121919310.3896@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:22:45PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > - you don't know the root device, so the kernel will
> > panic at boot because it cannot find the root device.
> > In this case, you have the partition list still on
> > the screen as it's among the latest things in the
> > boot order. And if your kernel reboots upon panic,
> > just boot it with panic=30 so get 30 seconds to read
> > the partition table.
>
> I have one machine inmy lab that turns out to need to boot from /dev/sdq1
>
> trust me, that partition info has LONG since scrolled off the screen by
> the time it fails to mount and panics.
Interesting. How many total partitions do you have ? I ask this because
David Alan Gilbert proposed a patch to dump the partition list on the
screen upon panic. Perhaps it's larger than the screen in you case ? If
you have more than 25 partitions, to you think they can fit with 2 or 3
columns ?
> I ended up setting up a serial console to capture the boot to figure this
> machine out, but that's a pretty extreme measure to have to go to.
>
> David Lang
>
> P.S. I had to do this after grub failed to mount by label (my guess is
> that grub only looks at so many drives before giving up on finding the
> label) so don't tell me that I should just use labels and then I wouldn't
> have to worry about this type of thing
I wouldn't tell you that, I *hate* labels. It causes lots of problems
when you simply move some disks between machines.
Regards,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-13 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-12 6:50 optional delay after partition detection at boot time subbie subbie
2005-06-12 7:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-12 7:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-06-12 10:15 ` subbie subbie
2005-06-12 10:27 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-06-12 10:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-13 2:22 ` David Lang
2005-06-13 4:17 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2005-06-13 7:02 ` David Lang
2005-06-12 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-06-12 11:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2005-06-12 11:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-06-12 12:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2005-06-12 13:10 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-12 13:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-06-13 1:46 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-12 13:25 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050613041705.GD8907@alpha.home.local \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=dlang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subbie_subbie@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.