From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: StorageWorks multipath support
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:15:20 +0200
Message-ID: <20050615131520.GC11423@marowsky-bree.de>
References: <20050615085634.GA16446@averon.dyndns.org>
Reply-To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050615085634.GA16446@averon.dyndns.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

On 2005-06-15T10:56:34, Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr> w=
rote:

> Hello,
>=20
> here is a note describing the lego blocks needed to have a fully
> operational multipath stack with StorageWorks and Qlogic hardware.

Christophe, is the "ghost" denomination there to stay?

If so, the passive paths (ie, to the non-active Service Processor) of
the EMC CLARiiON also might wish to use this...


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e <lmb@suse.de>

--=20
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business	 -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"