From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261777AbVFPRfs (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:35:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261778AbVFPRfs (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:35:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:7902 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261777AbVFPRfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:35:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:32:47 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "K.R. Foley" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eugeny S. Mints" , Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00 Message-ID: <20050616173247.GA32552@elte.hu> References: <20050608112801.GA31084@elte.hu> <42B0F72D.5040405@cybsft.com> <20050616072935.GB19772@elte.hu> <42B160F5.9060208@cybsft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B160F5.9060208@cybsft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * K.R. Foley wrote: > > could you uncomment the IO_APIC_CACHE define in > > arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c, and could you uncomment line 1109 in > > drivers/ide/ide-io.c - does this fix things? (in apic mode) > Couple of things: 1) I could not find IO_APIC_CACHE anywhere. I could > find IOAPIC_CACHE but the define was not commented in io_apic.c. Also > the BUG_ON at line 1109 in ide-io.c was not commented out either. So I > made the mental leap that you actually meant to comment these out > instead of uncomment them??? [...] yeah, sorry :-| > [...] That works to get the system booted. Although I am getting many > soft lockups now, minutes after the boot. Log attached. [...] hm, do you get actual lockups, or only the messages about them? I.e. does the system work fine if you [the sounds of careful thinking to get the word right] disable CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP, or does it lock up silently? > [...] 2) In my infinite wisdom before :-) I failed to attach my config > as I should have done before. Also, commenting out this looks like a sentence worth finishing? :) Ingo