From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261714AbVFPUmG (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:42:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261764AbVFPUmF (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:42:05 -0400 Received: from dilbert.robsims.com ([209.120.158.98]:62985 "EHLO mail.robsims.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261714AbVFPUl6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:41:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:41:57 -0600 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS. Message-ID: <20050616204157.GB23942@robsims.com> References: <20050615212825.GS23621@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <42B0BAF5.106@poczta.fm> <200506152144.56540.pmcfarland@downeast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506152144.56540.pmcfarland@downeast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: robsims@robsims.com (Rob Sims) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote: > > I've tried cd packet writing with UDF and it gives insane overhead of > > about 20%. What metadata you'd like to store for example on your > > flashdrive or a floppy disk? > > Uh, 20%? That sounds awfully high. You sure you didn't do something wrong? Fixed packet recording under UDF records data in 32/39 of sectors; this alone is 18%; I can easily see 2% in UDF itself. More specifically, each packet has a seven sector overhead. UDF sets the packet size to 32. -- Rob