From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: David L <idht4n@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:52:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050618225238.GB23688@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F22EC810AC3D3079BA9BB2D84F70@phx.gbl>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 03:49:33PM -0700, David L wrote:
> [snip]
> >On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote:
> >> I'm seeing the message:
> >>
> >> bad: scheduling while atomic!
> >>
> >> I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using
> >a
> >> vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1. Does this mean the
> >driver
> >> has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option?
> >How
> >> bad is "bad"? Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the
> >message,
> >> or what?
> >
> >can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing...
> It's on-line at:
>
> http://www.compulab.co.il/686-developer.htm
>
> under "Linux - kernel, drivers and patches".
>
> After unzipping, it's in:
>
> Drivers & Patches 2.6/Flash Disk/cl_fdrv.tgz
that's only part of the source though... can you point at the full one ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-18 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-18 21:59 bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad? David L
2005-06-18 22:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-18 22:49 ` David L
2005-06-18 22:52 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-06-18 23:19 ` David L
2005-06-18 23:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-18 22:18 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-18 22:33 ` David L
2005-06-19 0:50 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050618225238.GB23688@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=idht4n@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.