From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5KDa1u06560 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:36:01 -0400 Received: from strugglers.net (strugglers.net [212.13.198.70]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5KDa1Qd006535 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:36:01 -0400 Received: from andy by strugglers.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DkMRA-0000xr-MF for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:35:41 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:35:40 +0000 From: Andy Smith Message-ID: <20050620133540.GS754@strugglers.net> References: <1119268975.25392.34.camel@volt> <200506201517.01268.krienke@uni-koblenz.de> <36801.64.233.242.196.1119274009.squirrel@www.echohome.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45nhIriPRwzWsBkh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36801.64.233.242.196.1119274009.squirrel@www.echohome.org> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Is LVM safe? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com --45nhIriPRwzWsBkh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:26:49AM -0400, Erik Ohrnberger wrote: > The thought just crossed my mind that the failure rate of the LVM would be > the sum of the failure rates of all the disks in your LVM. You can run LVM on top of software RAID... (or indeed hardware RAID of course) --45nhIriPRwzWsBkh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCtsYsIJm2TL8VSQsRAtygAKDrQ3OILWBLcP//A//9PNncshRsEgCfVKlZ Jd3HHEZMTdY0obTef6+R98E= =9bht -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45nhIriPRwzWsBkh--