From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262076AbVFUJlt (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:41:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262090AbVFUJiP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:38:15 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:24765 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261657AbVFUJhp (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:37:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:37:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@lists.osdl.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump documentation update to introduce use of irqpoll Message-Id: <20050621023701.219705a4.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050621092613.GF3746@in.ibm.com> References: <20050621092613.GF3746@in.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vivek Goyal wrote: > > o Specify "irqpoll" command line option which loading second kernel. This > helps in reducing driver initialization failures in second kernel due > to shared interrupts. Well that rather assumes we've merged the irqpoll patch. Is Alan OK with that?