From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261765AbVFUIuv (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:50:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262089AbVFUIrx (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:47:53 -0400 Received: from ms004msg.fastwebnet.it ([213.140.2.58]:17549 "EHLO ms004msg.fastwebnet.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261765AbVFUIoP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:44:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:44:05 +0200 From: Paolo Ornati To: "colin" Cc: Subject: Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? Message-ID: <20050621104405.73fba2fa@localhost> In-Reply-To: <004c01c5762d$7938d220$106215ac@realtek.com.tw> References: <004c01c5762d$7938d220$106215ac@realtek.com.tw> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:50:12 +0800 "colin" wrote: > Hi all, > Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? > Can you summary it? http://kerneltrap.org/node/4800 http://kerneltrap.org/node/4803 ... -- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.12 on x86_64