From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Scott Parish" Subject: Re: [PATCH] sHype access control architecture for Xen Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:32:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20050621123220.GA16276@us.ibm.com> References: <1119288179.17919.31.camel@secureip.watson.ibm.com> <9cde8bff05062022475468b1c9@mail.gmail.com> <42B7B300.6090903@tupshin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B7B300.6090903@tupshin.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Tupshin Harper Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, ronpz@us.ibm.com, leendert@us.ibm.com, rvaldez@us.ibm.com, sailer@us.ibm.com, xense-devel@lists.xensource.com, Reiner Sailer , stefanb@us.ibm.com, steven.hand@cl.cam.ac.uk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:26:08PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote: > Ensuring that the code compiles cleanly with gcj would eliminate this issue. Not everyone installs gcj either. sRp -- Scott Parish Signed-off-by: srparish@us.ibm.com