From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] lib/zlib*: possible cleanups
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:37:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050621133738.GM3666@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050620172920.541f4112.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:29:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> >
> > - #if 0 the following unused functions:
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate.c: zlib_deflateSetDictionary
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate.c: zlib_deflateParams
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate.c: zlib_deflateCopy
> > - zlib_inflate/infblock.c: zlib_inflate_set_dictionary
> > - zlib_inflate/infblock.c: zlib_inflate_blocks_sync_point
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_sync.c: zlib_inflateSync
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_sync.c: zlib_inflateSyncPoint
>
> OK...
>
> > - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's:
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.c: zlib_deflateCopy
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.c: zlib_deflateParams
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_syms.c: zlib_inflateSync
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_syms.c: zlib_inflateSyncPoint
>
> Adrian, I've dropped just about every "remove the following unneeded
> EXPORT_SYMBOL's" I've seen in the past several months. We've been round this
> numerous times.
>
> The question is, who are we screwing if we remove these?
>
> It's difficult to answer, but we need to answer it.
I'm sorry, but I'm not getting your point:
First, you ACK the part of my patch to #if 0 unused functions.
Then you complain that I've documented which EXPORT_SYMBOL's I have to
remove because I have #if 0'ed the functions they are exporting.
Will the patch be OK for you if I'll simply remove the part of the patch
description stating which of the #if 0'ed functions had been exported?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-21 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-20 23:43 [2.6 patch] lib/zlib*: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2005-06-21 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 13:37 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-06-27 8:51 ` Kjartan Maraas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-30 20:02 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-30 0:28 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-17 0:08 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-06 21:25 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050621133738.GM3666@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.